Some research background and highlights from my time at Stanford and Delft University of Technology

Scanning SQUID microscopySQUID_schematic

A Superconducting QUantum Interference Device (SQUID) is a very sensitive magnetic flux detector. The SQUIDs that are used in the Moler lab are designed to be compatible with scanning and to provide a spatial resolution on the micron scale. On the right an optical image of the pick-up loop and field coil of a SQUID as described in this paper by Huber et al is shown. The pick-up loop and field coil are on the corner of the chip, which will be scanned close to a sample. As shown in the schematic the pickup loop is part of a SQUID loop. The SQUID and field coil have a gradiometric design, such that running a current through the field coil applies a local magnetic field to the sample without inducing net flux in the SQUID. Different measurement modes are: 1) probing local magnetism, 2) probing local magnetic response using the field coil (e.g. the diamagnetic response of a superconductor), 3) imaging transport by sensing the magnetic field produced by a current, 4) probing ring currents induced by flux threading the ring (e.g. to measure the I-Φ characteristic of a junction in a superconducting ring or persistent currents in a normal ring).


Imaging current in two-dimensional topological insulators

The current in a two-dimensional topological insulator (2D TI) is expected to be carried by edge channels, which so far is only evidenced by transport measurements. At Stanford we have imaged the current density in HgTe quantum well as well as in InAs/GaSb quantum wells, the first and second experimentally realized TIs, and directly observed that current flows in the edges. The measurement principle is shown in the cartoon. A current (blue) flows at the edge of a device (green), producing a magnetic field (red) that is measured by detecting the flux through the SQUID’s  pickup loop (white). For a two-dimensional current density we can reconstruct the current distribution from the flux image. An example is shown on the right. The normalized x-component of the current density when the Fermi level in the device is tuned into the bulk energy gap. shows that the current flow along the edge of the device.


Quantum dots confining single electrons for spin based quantum information processing


(a) The QDs are defined in a (Al,Ga)As/GaAs two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) by locally depleting the 2DEG using surface gates. (b) AFM image of a double dot device with the circles indicating the rough position of the dots. Next to the dots a quantum point contact (QPC) is formed, a narrow channel whose resistance depends on the charge on the dots. By monitoring the current IQPC we can infer the charge state of the double QD. (c) Measured charge stability diagram of a double QD. Displayed is the differential current through the QPC as a function of the voltage applied to LG and RG. A change in IQPC (and hence a peak in the differentiated current) occurs when an electron is added to the double dot. Labels (NL,NR) indicate the numbers of electrons on the left and right dot. The (0,0) region is identified by the absence of lines in the lower left region. Tuning into this region and then loading the QD with a known number of electrons is the starting point of our spin-dependent experiments.

Independent read-out of two coupled spins in the solid state

double_dot-02independent_read_out-01Measurement of coupled quantum systems plays a central role in quantum information processing. At TU Delft we have realized independent single-shot read-out of two electron spins in a double quantum  dot. The read-out method was all-electrical, cross-talk between the two measurements is negligible. Using this read-out we could directly probe the anticorrelations between two spins prepared in a singlet state and to demonstrate the operation of the two-qubit exchange gate on a complete set of basis states.

On the right electrochemical potential diagrams showing the double-dot configuration in the two read-out stages. Tunnel events that occur for a ↓↓ state are indicated. Below the diagram single-shot read-out traces are shown, displaying the difference of the current through the two QPCs, which are oppositely biased (22). The first and second parts correspond to read-out of the right and left dots, respectively. Four typical responses are shown, one for each of the possible two-spin states.

Coherently control a single spin using electric fields



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s